Comments on: Wikipedia’s Close-Out Sale on Administrator Integrity http://timedoctor.org/2009/02/wikipedias-close-out-sale-on-administrator-integrity/ Sat, 28 Jan 2012 10:21:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: mrBlaQ http://timedoctor.org/2009/02/wikipedias-close-out-sale-on-administrator-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-4464 mrBlaQ Thu, 26 Feb 2009 01:50:00 +0000 http://timedoctor.org/?p=381#comment-4464 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EzQuake *cough* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EzQuake

*cough*

]]> By: TimeDoctor http://timedoctor.org/2009/02/wikipedias-close-out-sale-on-administrator-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-4317 TimeDoctor Sun, 22 Feb 2009 02:50:07 +0000 http://timedoctor.org/?p=381#comment-4317 Regardless, they can apply those reasons for deletion like mayonnaise on a hot butter knife to whatever articles they want. Only if someone truly dedicated goes after it and researches the methods of restoring the article through petition will the article be restored. Even then, the article must be monitored or it can be deleted and remain gone for days, weeks, or months at a time. Regardless, they can apply those reasons for deletion like mayonnaise on a hot butter knife to whatever articles they want. Only if someone truly dedicated goes after it and researches the methods of restoring the article through petition will the article be restored.

Even then, the article must be monitored or it can be deleted and remain gone for days, weeks, or months at a time.

]]> By: 1211 http://timedoctor.org/2009/02/wikipedias-close-out-sale-on-administrator-integrity/comment-page-1/#comment-4288 1211 Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:05:34 +0000 http://timedoctor.org/?p=381#comment-4288 not any reason. They have to follow accepted deletion policy such as: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD not any reason. They have to follow accepted deletion policy such as:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CSD

]]>